Re: Poor Canada
Friday, 14 March 2008 12:07
Fair vs. unfair ?
The only unfair is a colour of the hair on the black man's bum 
Quicktime2 in this forum we often have no proven facts and deal with many inuendos and associations.
You seem to have associated with Sambatogo. So far no problem.
As far as Kamil, was it Sambatogo who wrote :
"We are getting some interesting responses. We have someone who wants to learn the facts and try to understand why some of the IDSF rules have been established and why they are not applied the same way by all IDSF associations."
No. It was Quicktime2, you.
What did you mean by "we" ? I would like to believe you speak for yourself and not "us" , and it is possible you speak for "yourselves", which , again and by association, would make you sound as Sambatogo, and his "we"( my spouse and I as, "clarified" by Sambatogo )
As for Kamil, did you not mean 'Kamil' when you noted,"We are getting some interesting responses..." ?
Did you not mean Kamil when you wrote in the third tense: "We have someone who wants to learn the facts and try to understand " ? (have you not sounded as a 'teacher' who says: "What have we here ?", and everyone in the class knows exactly what the teacher is talking about ?
I will not repeat the meaning of "we" but point out that it very much sounded as if you were belittleing Kamil, and by logical association you were insinuating that the "someone who wants to learn the facts and try to understand" was exactly the person who responded under his real name, that is Kamil....and if you had not addressed and zeroed in on Kamil, you certainly did not make it clear, and again, by association, and especially that there was no one else who, in my opinion, wanted to learn "the facts", you meant abd refered to Kamil.
And since you felt I was fair sometimes in the past, please note that Kamil's and his lovely partner's name had been mentioned in the past, with very negative, hurtful, and ill conceived conclusions, and if you disagreed how unfairly Kamil was treated in this Forum, I would have expected more sensitivity from you, but again, by association you have sided with Sambatogo , who has apparently blinds on "their" eyes, and calls contributors Idiots, and speaks just as you when he reffers to himself as "we". Perhaps you meant no harm, perhaps you are just some Royalty and use "we" as the Royals would.
( This Forum would be honored to enjoy having such a nobel contributor, even a few folks with the blue blood. I am disappointed Sambatogo is not such a person, he excluded himself when he admited he speaks for his spouse and himself- suppose she stands by him nodding to everything he types, or worse, stands by him with 2X4 and dictates to him what to write - in which case-Poor Sambatogo, and shame on his wife calling contributor P-maker Idiots, and ridiculing the rather peculiar  Nick name )
I suspect this is not the case.
And who was it discussing understanding of democracy ? You.
I suppose you were right when saying you cannot stop people expressing their views here, but incorrect in concluding it had anything to do with democracy, it has to do with freedom to express and to speak, and above all the availability and lack of restriction and censorship and permission of the web master to post under the cover of Nick names.
By association Quicktime2 you might as well be Sambatogo, and in reality it does not matter if you are or not, since both of you write, think and write exactly the same thing, with the exception you have not yet started calling contributors names, something which this my response to you may change ?
Besides, you and Sambatogo appear to be in agreement with each other, after all you had the opportunity to disagree with Sambatogo when " they" wrote:
" But to be politicly active on a public forum such as this just 1 week before the CADA Championships could be seen as trying to gather brownie points? KamilS has no Crystal Ball into the future, so as a competitor it is always "A still tongue in a wise head" type of best policy.
Sambatogo. "
You did not, and your silence you condoned what Sambatogo posted, and you have no excuse you did not read Sambatogo's insulting note and suggestion, because you have logged on and responded to my comments. Why haven't you corrected Sambatogo ? Do you also believe "A still tongue in a wise head" type policy, suggested by Sambatogo to "a competitor" was directed to who else, but to Kamil ?
You had missed even the opportunity to inform Sambatogo, that Kamil had become an active member of this Forum in 2006, and that he has been "politicaly active" on the forum since 2006, and not just a week before the CADA Championship.
And the suggestion of the 'brownie points' ???? Do you also agree ?
How goes the saying : 'You want to lie with the wolf....etc "
(PS I have nothing against contributors who are blinded, one sided, ready to follow like a sheep selected goal and walk in one direction, but I object if they in their 'call it ignorance' start hurting, and/or attacking someone else)
By the way, by signig his real name, Kamil shows more courage than you, I, Sambatogo, and the whole bunch of annonymous contributors put together.
But that's just my opinion.
|