Re: Does it need to be bull #@! ???

68 results... < Previous Page ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Page >
   
Joined on 14 May 2007
Total posts: 21

Re: Does it need to be bull #@! ???

Saturday, 27 June 2009 17:30

Saturday, 27 June 2009 17:15

gabriela_S

@Pink Unicorn,   your story upsets me.

it appears is the same everywhere,  the success , or a demise of  dancers   depends on the decision of judges.

Unfortunately, and your   story is a testimony that dancesport bull#@!   has permeated dancesport .  The couple in your story has obviously run into one or more judges whose "bull#@!  influences their (probably better ) judgement, resulting in lower total recalls and inability to reach the ( apparently )  deserved   higher placement.

More under under  thread Does it need be bull#@! started by webminder.___________________

----

 Please don't be upset because we are not! We have been around for a long time now to know how things work.

The difference between us and newcomers is that we know better and just enjoy to see our kids dancing and have great support from our teachers. Results are another story! If you can not accept it then do something else.

smd
Joined on 13 Feb 2009
Total posts: 21

Re: Does it need to be bull #@! ???

Saturday, 27 June 2009 19:51

Assuming I've got the correct couple you are involved with and that the Dancesportinfo profiles is correct:  there is only one domestic competition that they didn't make the final?? The Blackpool Junior seems quite respectable also.

Perhaps there are many more domestic results for this couple, that this site doesn't have, that back up your point?

I do think that your attitude about the enjoyment your children have in dancing is absolutely correct, regardless of whether or not you are correct that their results don't reflect the quality of their dancing.

 

Joined on 24 May 2009
Total posts: 9

Re: Does it need to be bull #@! ???

Sunday, 28 June 2009 08:47

[moderated by Admin at the request of involved parties]

Joined on 07 Jan 2009
Total posts: 32

Re: Does it need to be bull #@! ???

Sunday, 28 June 2009 19:54

 

 

pink unicorn I think the attitude is exactly right.  First and most important the couple must enjoy their dancing. Some results will be good and everyone is happy and others they will be a disappointment.  That is part and parcel of being a competitor.

Please forgive me if I make a few comments on your couples results and especially those you mention from Spain. In the Standard there were only 5 competitors in total 4 from Spain. In the Latin there were 15 and only from Spain and Portugal. They were not competing against any of the couples they come up against in EADA events so it is impossible to make a comparison between results in  England and abroad.  What I did notice was that in the dancesportinfo ratings their Latin rating actually went down so the result was worse than they could have expected.

It is hardly surprising that their own teacher rates them highly and in relation to this topic  people complain about teachers marking their pupils better.

I wish them all the very best of success because for sure England needs all their Junior competitors to have long careers.

Joined on 14 May 2007
Total posts: 21

Re: Does it need to be bull #@! ???

Sunday, 28 June 2009 23:36

[moderated by Admin at the request of involved parties]

Joined on 07 Jan 2009
Total posts: 32

Re: Does it need to be bull #@! ???

Monday, 29 June 2009 16:56

pink unicorn please do not misunderstand me. You and the couple are clearly very proud of the results achieved outside England. Unfortunately it seems to me that you are then using these results as the basis to believe that the results in England are not fair. This is a huge mistake in my opinion and I think they do themselves a dis-service almost sour grapes sounding. It is meaningless beating International couples if the quality is not there. Even the lone Russian couple who convincingly won both events are rated by dancesportinfo at 461 and 1472 in the world.

[moderated by Admin at the request of involved parties]

 Had there been the full quota of EADA competitors then the results might have been very different  who knows.   The majority   of competitors   were from  Ireland which is not known for extremely high standard competitors.   I did see there were only 5 judges for the Junior Open events 2 of whom were from England (a husband and wife team) who may or may not be  their teachers.  There were  some Danish adjudicators and it appears they had brought their couples to compete also

 

[moderated by Admin at the request of involved parties]

Joined on 14 May 2007
Total posts: 21

Re: Does it need to be bull #@! ???

Tuesday, 30 June 2009 08:05

I think you must have had a bad day to attack all those U16 Junior competitors!!! My vues do not change. But I think you should apologize to all of them bellow! And who cares that they are not ranked in your top 100 world best!!!

Placing   Names CN Round Marks
1   Artemiy Katashinskiy & Marina Katashinskiy (Russia) 68 F
2   Geraint Heaney & Clara Roy (UK) 65 F
3   Shane Leen & Katie Vickers (Ireland) 72 F
4   Valerijs Borovojs & Inesa Orlova (Ireland) 54 F
5   David Lawes & Aisling Killeen (Ireland) 70 F
6   Søren Munk & Natalie Winter (Denmark) 75 F
7   William Boxwell & Aisling Hannon (Ireland) 55 3 12
8   Sean Finnegan & Michelle Mutuleasa (Ireland) 64 3 1
8   Mathias Husted & Sille Husted Jespersen (Denmark) 67 3 1
8   Sarah Toal & Jessica Young (Ireland) 83 3 1
11   Donna Cullen & Shannon Fitzgerald (Ireland) 61 3 0
12   Kristoffer Støhs & Josephine Husted Jespersen (Denmark) 82 2 8
13   Stefan Cloudt & Eline Cloudt (Holland) 59 2 6
13   Ryan Sirt & Rebecca Tracey (Ireland) 80 2 6
15   Stephen Kennedy & Sara Downey (Ireland) 69 2 3
16   Cormac Campbell & Demi-Leigh Smyth (Ireland) 56 2 1
17   George Mihailefscu & Karen Gaffney (Ireland) 74 1 10
17   Nicklas Olesen & Camilla Siggaard (Denmark) 77 1 10
19   Mads Husted & Trine Thomasen Skov (Denmark) 66 1 7
20   Pernille Skjøth & Charlotte Skjøth (Denmark) 81 1 5
21   Jessica Carroll & Alannah Kane (Ireland) 58 1 1
21   Sophie Lawlor & Holly Louise Larkin (Ireland) 71 1 1

Placing   Names CN Round Marks
1   Artemiy Katashinskiy & Marina Katashinskiy (Russia) 68 F
2   Lasse Ellgaard Frederiksen & Christine Kragmann (Denmark) 63 F
3   Søren Munk & Natalie Winter (Denmark) 75 F
4   Geraint Heaney & Clara Roy (UK) 65 F
5   Valerijs Borovojs & Inesa Orlova (Ireland) 54 F
6   Mathias Husted & Sille Husted Jespersen (Denmark) 67 F
7   Sean Finnegan & Michelle Mutuleasa (Ireland) 64 3 9
8   Shane Leen & Katie Vickers (Ireland) 72 3 8
9   William Boxwell & Aisling Hannon (Ireland) 55 3 5
10   Mads Banner & Michelle Mortensen (Denmark) 87 3 4
11   Stephen Carroll & Hazel Ryan (Ireland) 57 3 2
12   David Lawes & Aisling Killeen (Ireland) 70 3 1
13   Stephen Kennedy & Sara Downey (Ireland) 69 2 14
14   Kristoffer Støhs & Josephine Husted Jespersen (Denmark) 82 2 13
15   Donna Cullen & Shannon Fitzgerald (Ireland) 61 2 9
15   Sarah Toal & Jessica Young (Ireland) 83 2 9
17   Daniel Banner & Jasmin Cao (Denmark) 53 2 7
18   Ryan Sirt & Rebecca Tracey (Ireland) 80 2 3
19   Cormac Campbell & Demi-Leigh Smyth (Ireland) 56 1 11
19   George Mihailefscu & Karen Gaffney (Ireland) 74 1 11
19   Nicklas Olesen & Camilla Siggaard (Denmark) 77 1 11
22   Pernille Skjøth & Charlotte Skjøth (Denmark) 81 1 8
23   Mads Husted & Trine Thomasen Skov (Denmark) 66 1 6
24   Kristian Bak & Nadja Nielsen (Denmark) 52 1 5
25   Stefan Cloudt & Eline Cloudt (Holland) 59 1 2

 

Joined on 07 Jan 2009
Total posts: 32

Re: Does it need to be bull #@! ???

Tuesday, 30 June 2009 15:10

Attack?  I am so sorry that you have chosen to see attack where there is none. I am so sorry that you have chosen to avoid the reality.

You see a need for apology. Interesting.

Please may I ask will you now apologise to the fine English competitors you attack suggesting they lack ability and do not deserve to beat[moderated by Admin at the request of involved parties]?  Will you now apologise to the Adjudicators you have attacked suggesting they are either incompetent or corrupt as they have not marked your couple into a  final?  

Joined on 14 May 2007
Total posts: 21

Re: Does it need to be bull #@! ???

Tuesday, 30 June 2009 16:16

 

Nice try! After reading all your post from January I realise that I will not win that one with you!

p.s

The Russian dancer that you have slated for been a poor dancer due to his ranking was a finalist at the Junior Blackpool!!! That is not bad in my books!

Have a nice life!

smd
Joined on 13 Feb 2009
Total posts: 21

Re: Does it need to be bull #@! ???

Tuesday, 30 June 2009 17:20

Hi pink _unicorn,

I just had a look at that Russian winner's results on here. The junior Blackpool result you quoted is for the 12/13 age group. This means they are U14. A good U14 couple, but it does make the rating by this site's system quite reasonable. So it looks like the couples at this competiton,  nice one to attend for development, are from the young and ambitious group and not from the top 30/40 non-UK couples?

Comparing apples and oranges?

On a less questioning note: what you are doing seems a very sensible way of enjoying and progressing your couple's dancing. They are gaining confidence and experience against the couples outside the UK, which should stand them in good stead as they mature and  begin to dance in the major competions. I think UK couples should try to follow your example instead of playing exclusively in our own backyard!

 

68 results... < Previous Page ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Page >