Re: Provocative EADA statement.
Saturday, 29 August 2009 10:23
The EADA website currently contains what I and many others would consider a provocative statement with regard to Mr Maxwell standing down from the IPDSC Presidency.
By all means express regret regarding the ill health but to then "thank him" for dividing the Professional dance world and with his involvment in the setting up of a body attempting to bring harm to the World Dance Council.
The British Dance Council is a member of the WDC.
EADA is a member of the BDC. Is EADA cheering on the enemy? Make no mistakee there are those in Italy and Russia who mean harm to British Dancing.
To be delighted that through his hard work the membetship has GROWN to "40 countries". I would say the use of the word "growth" is misinformation.
30 countries attended the setting up meeting. The IPDSC show they have 36 Full member countries. 27 countries attended the last IPDSC AGM. 5 sent apolgies or a proxy.
This number includes DanceSport America of which no one has knowledge plus one or two others about which I will refrain from making comment at this time.
This "growth" ignores the resignation of Mr Shaugnessy (2 top officials - founding members gone in lessthan 2 months). the fall in the number of IPDSC competitors at their so called World Championships (From 90 couples in 2007 down to 67 couples in 2008 and 44 of those from Italy). It ignores that one country Switzerland has split and there is now a separate Amateur League for those who want no more of IDSF/IPDSC.
Do EADA have no loyalty to British Dancing and British Coaches? Have they forgotten Junior Blackpool already? Why not just say straight out "We are backing Italy and Russia".
|