Re: WDC AL WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP ADJUDICATORS
Thursday, 08 October 2009 17:01
I'm not suggesting that the outcome of World pro standard should have been any different,
well for the first 4 anyway, but just saying that "the English" (WDC) judges aren't clean of bias either. Let's take the last British Open for example.
If the adjudicators had judged what they saw on the floor, then clearly Bosco and Pitton would not have finished 13th. Same goes for the GOC 2009 where Karabeys were undoubtably weaker of the two pairings in the eyes of the public (expect the germans) and not-adjudicating judges. Is this suggesting that the judging panel sees something different than the spectating judges? No.
It just shows that some individuals from "the English" did not like the fact that Paolo & Silvia decided to continue their career in the IPDSC and accepted the invitation to the World Games.
Although I'm unaware of the TV-broadcast you mentioned, I think it's safe to assume that Silde & Fristova will become the new world champions as will Ferruggia&Koehler in the standard category despite the fact that Silde DID and Ferruggia COULD HAVE(although I think they would have not) lost their placing in the British Open, because the panel can only consist of one of the disfavouring (for mentioned couples) "English" judge instead of a whole bunch.
Again, not saying that the WDC AL judging panel is bad, no, no, but that also the core of the dancing world can have somehthing on their mind that can blur their vision and judgement.
|